top of page
Working Together

Unit 6: Successive Approximation Model (SAM)

SAM Overview

Developed by Michael W. Allen, Successive Approximation Model (or SAM) is a collaborative framework that involves close collaboration between instructional designers (IDs), subject matter experts (SMEs), and stakeholders when designing and developing programs/courses that require frequent change. 

P H A S E S

Office Meeting Discussion

Overview

PREPERATION

The Preparation phase focuses on cross-collaboration between IDs, SMEs, and stakeholders to gather as much necessary information (project goals, target audience/learners, learning objectives, and existing resources).

Components of Preparation:

  • Project Initiation: meetings between SMEs, IDs, and stakeholders.

  • Needs Assessment: gather data.

  • Define Learning Objectives: measurable learning outcomes

  • Background Info Gathering: collect data on industry/field, learners, trends.

  • Stakeholders Collaboration: SMEs, stakeholders, instructors, and sponsors provide valuable insights and input.

arrows-down-up-icon-lg.png

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • Stakeholder Transparency: frequent reviews eliminate content and learning outcome misalignment.

  • Agile: pivoting does not destroy or derail the project roadmap.

  • Functional Testing: catching issues in Alpha is cheaper than fixing them in Gold or Rollout.​

Limitations

  • ​Resource Intensive: constant loops, iterative evaluations, and improvements require high SME and stakeholder availability.

  • Feedback Fatigue: repeatable revisions and 'messy' prototypes can cause teams to grow tired.

  • Budget Creep: iterations may cause extended timelines and constant PM oversight.

The Successive Approximation Model (SAM) is an excellent framework for cross-collaboration and catching errors via prototypes. This framework emphasizes frequent feedback and rapid prototyping and is best used in e-learning/distant learning environments across audiences (K12, higher ed, corporate). 

​

Considering several factors, SAM could be beneficial for my minicourse. Including the following strengths:

  • Great for testing the "Digital Toolkit" learning tool

  • Formative evaluation, gaining immediate feedback for immediate improvements

  • For self-directed learners

 

However, the cons outweigh the pros.

  • Each phase requires too many components and stakeholders

  • Possibly too slow compared to Rapid Instructional Development (RID)

  • My minicourse doesn't require continuous prototyping

  • Constant testing

​
I believe other models that require less stakeholder input and testing may be more suitable for my minicourse. 

Applying SAM to My Minicourse

References

​University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Identifying an instructional design model for a minicourse. Brightspace. 

​

University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Iterative design phase. Brightspace. 

​​

​University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Iterative development phase. Brightspace. 

​

University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Overview of the successive approximation model (SAM). Brightspace. 

​

University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Preparation phase. Brightspace. 

​

University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Strengths and limitations of SAM. Brightspace. 

Jerin Black-Davis Portfolio

Thank you for taking the time to checkout what I'm working on.

SOCIALS 

Jerin Black-Davis ID Portfolio © 2026 Jerin Black-Davis | Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

bottom of page